![]() ![]() Petersen RC (2016) Mild cognitive impairment. O’Bryant S, O’Jile J, McCaffrey R (2004) Reporting of demographic variables in neuropsychological research: trends in the current literature. Ĭova I, Del Tedesco F, Maggiore L et al (2020) Cognitive disorders in migrants: retrospective analysis in a Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia in Milan. Ĭanevelli M, Lacorte E, Cova I et al (2019) Estimating dementia cases amongst migrants living in Europe. Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E et al (2013) The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. The potential availability of many culturally adapted and translated versions of the MoCA increases the chance of offering a linguistically and culturally sensitive screening for cognitive impairment to diverse populations further studies are needed to identify if MoCA can be considered a truly cross-cultural fair test. The quality of the process of cultural adaptation of MoCA differs considerably among different available versions as well as the number of items adapted in the various language versions. Culturally different adapted versions of the MoCA were unevenly distributed across different geographic areas. Overall, 86 culturally different versions of MoCA are available: 74 versions on the MoCA website (25 of them have a corresponding paper concerning the translation process found with the systematic review) and 12 additional versions identified only with the search in biomedical databases. Adapted versions were identified through a systematic review in 3 databases and on the MoCA website. ![]() Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cochlear implants cognitive assessment hearing loss.This study provides a systematic review of linguistically and culturally adapted versions of the original Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) full version. ![]() Clinically, modifications to the presentation of the MoCA might not be necessary for CI users however, clinicians should be aware that the delayed recall task is inherently harder for these patients. Furthermore, irrespective of presentation modality, our participants scored higher on both MoCA versions when the delayed recall task was removed. While our findings suggest that the modality of presentation for the MoCA does not influence overall performance for postlingually deafened CI users, visual presentation of stimuli impacted performance on delayed recall. Participants also performed better on the delayed recall task on the HI-MoCA than on the standard MoCA. Participants scored higher on both test versions when the delayed recall task was removed. There was no significant difference in performance between the standard MoCA and HI-MoCA. We assessed differences in pass/fail status when items from the attention and language sections and the delayed recall task were removed. We administered the standard MoCA and HI-MoCA to 21 CI users and compared their performance. In order to investigate the clinical utility of the HI-MoCA, we assessed performance between the standard MoCA and HI-MoCA among postlingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) users. ![]() Recently, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was modified for use with hearing-impaired populations (ie, HI-MoCA). Commonly used cognitive screening tools were not originally developed for patients with hearing loss (HL) and rely heavily on the ability to hear the instructions and test stimuli. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |